On Fri 22-09-17 17:57:26, Tetsuo Handa wrote: [...] > Michal Hocko has nacked this patch [3], and he suggested an alternative > patch [4]. But he himself is not ready to clarify all the concerns with > the alternative patch [5]. In addition to that, nobody is interested in > either patch; we can not make progress here. Let's choose this patch for > now, for this patch has smaller impact than the alternative patch. My Nack stands and it is really annoying you are sending a patch for inclusion regardless of that fact. An alternative approach has been proposed and the mere fact that I do not have time to pursue this direction is not reason to go with a incomplete solution. This is not an issue many people would be facing to scream for a quick and dirty workarounds AFAIK (there have been 0 reports from non-artificial workloads). > [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/e6c83a26-1d59-4afd-55cf-04e58bdde188@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [2] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/201708090835.ICI69305.VFFOLMHOStJOQF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [3] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170821084307.GB25956@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [4] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1503577106-9196-2-git-send-email-penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [5] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170918064353.v35prpp6bkkbgqr6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Fixes: 696453e66630ad45 ("mm, oom: task_will_free_mem should skip oom_reaped tasks") > Reported-by: Manish Jaggi <mjaggi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> > Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
