On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 09:19:56AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 08/09/2017 01:07 PM, Tycho Andersen wrote: > > --- a/lib/swiotlb.c > > +++ b/lib/swiotlb.c > > @@ -420,8 +420,9 @@ static void swiotlb_bounce(phys_addr_t orig_addr, phys_addr_t tlb_addr, > > { > > unsigned long pfn = PFN_DOWN(orig_addr); > > unsigned char *vaddr = phys_to_virt(tlb_addr); > > + struct page *page = pfn_to_page(pfn); > > > > - if (PageHighMem(pfn_to_page(pfn))) { > > + if (PageHighMem(page) || xpfo_page_is_unmapped(page)) { > > /* The buffer does not have a mapping. Map it in and copy */ > > unsigned int offset = orig_addr & ~PAGE_MASK; > > char *buffer; > > This is a little scary. I wonder how many more of these are in the > kernel, like: I don't know, but I assume several :) > > static inline void *skcipher_map(struct scatter_walk *walk) > > { > > struct page *page = scatterwalk_page(walk); > > > > return (PageHighMem(page) ? kmap_atomic(page) : page_address(page)) + > > offset_in_page(walk->offset); > > } > > Is there any better way to catch these? Like, can we add some debugging > to check for XPFO pages in __va()? Yes, and perhaps also a debugging check in PageHighMem? Would __va have caught either of the two cases you've pointed out? Tycho -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>