Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm, sysctl: make VM stats configurable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/15/2017 04:49 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Why do we need an auto-mode? Is it safe to enforce by default.

Do we *need* it?  Not really.

But, it does offer the best of both worlds: The vast majority of users
see virtually no impact from the counters.  The minority that do need
them pay the cost *and* don't have to change their tooling at all.

> Is it> possible that userspace can get confused to see 0 NUMA stats in
the
> first read while other allocation stats are non-zero?

I doubt it.  Those counters are pretty worthless by themselves.  I have
tooling that goes and reads them, but it aways displays deltas.  Read
stats, sleep one second, read again, print the difference.

The only scenario I can see mattering is someone who is seeing a
performance issue due to NUMA allocation misses (or whatever) and wants
to go look *back* in the past.

A single-time printk could also go a long way to keeping folks from
getting confused.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux