On Fri 08-09-17 12:35:13, Dan Williams wrote: > The mmap(2) syscall suffers from the ABI anti-pattern of not validating > unknown flags. However, proposals like MAP_SYNC and MAP_DIRECT need a > mechanism to define new behavior that is known to fail on older kernels > without the support. Define a new MAP_SHARED_VALIDATE flag pattern that > is guaranteed to fail on all legacy mmap implementations. > > With this in place new flags can be defined as: > > #define MAP_new (MAP_SHARED_VALIDATE | val) Is this changelog stale? Given MAP_SHARED_VALIDATE will be new mapping type, I'd expect we define new flags just as any other mapping flags... I see no reason why MAP_SHARED_VALIDATE should be or'ed to that. > It is worth noting that the original proposal was for a standalone > MAP_VALIDATE flag. However, when that could not be supported by all > archs Linus observed: > > I see why you *think* you want a bitmap. You think you want > a bitmap because you want to make MAP_VALIDATE be part of MAP_SYNC > etc, so that people can do > > ret = mmap(NULL, size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED > | MAP_SYNC, fd, 0); > > and "know" that MAP_SYNC actually takes. > > And I'm saying that whole wish is bogus. You're fundamentally > depending on special semantics, just make it explicit. It's already > not portable, so don't try to make it so. > > Rename that MAP_VALIDATE as MAP_SHARED_VALIDATE, make it have a value > of 0x3, and make people do > > ret = mmap(NULL, size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED_VALIDATE > | MAP_SYNC, fd, 0); > > and then the kernel side is easier too (none of that random garbage > playing games with looking at the "MAP_VALIDATE bit", but just another > case statement in that map type thing. > > Boom. Done. > > Similar to ->fallocate() we also want the ability to validate the > support for new flags on a per ->mmap() 'struct file_operations' > instance basis. Towards that end arrange for flags to be generically > validated against a mmap_supported_mask exported by 'struct > file_operations'. By default all existing flags are implicitly > supported, but new flags require MAP_SHARED_VALIDATE and > per-instance-opt-in. > > Cc: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> > Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> > Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/alpha/include/uapi/asm/mman.h | 1 + > arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/mman.h | 1 + > arch/parisc/include/uapi/asm/mman.h | 1 + > arch/xtensa/include/uapi/asm/mman.h | 1 + > include/linux/fs.h | 1 + > include/linux/mman.h | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h | 1 + > mm/mmap.c | 10 +++++- > tools/include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h | 1 + > 9 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/alpha/include/uapi/asm/mman.h b/arch/alpha/include/uapi/asm/mman.h > index 3b26cc62dadb..c32276c4196a 100644 > --- a/arch/alpha/include/uapi/asm/mman.h > +++ b/arch/alpha/include/uapi/asm/mman.h > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ > #define MAP_TYPE 0x0f /* Mask for type of mapping (OSF/1 is _wrong_) */ > #define MAP_FIXED 0x100 /* Interpret addr exactly */ > #define MAP_ANONYMOUS 0x10 /* don't use a file */ > +#define MAP_SHARED_VALIDATE (MAP_SHARED|MAP_PRIVATE) /* validate extension flags */ And I'd explicitely define MAP_SHARED_VALIDATE as the first unused value among mapping types (which is in fact enum embedded inside mapping flags). I.e. 0x03 on alpha, x86, and probably all other archs - it has nothing to do with MAP_SHARED|MAP_PRIVATE - it is just another type of the mapping which happens to have most of the MAP_SHARED semantics... Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
