On Tue 29-08-17 11:01:50, Roman Gushchin wrote: [...] > diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c > index b9cf3cf4a3d0..a69d23082abf 100644 > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c > @@ -1792,6 +1792,9 @@ static void refill_stock(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages) > } > stock->nr_pages += nr_pages; > > + if (stock->nr_pages > CHARGE_BATCH) > + drain_stock(stock); > + > local_irq_restore(flags); > } Why do we need this? In other words, why cannot we rely on draining we already do? > > @@ -5886,8 +5889,7 @@ void mem_cgroup_uncharge_skmem(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages) > > this_cpu_sub(memcg->stat->count[MEMCG_SOCK], nr_pages); > > - page_counter_uncharge(&memcg->memory, nr_pages); > - css_put_many(&memcg->css, nr_pages); > + refill_stock(memcg, nr_pages); > } This makes sense to me. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
