On 08/29/2017 02:22 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 12:04:41PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: >> >> Hm, so this seems to revert Mel's 444eb2a449ef ("mm: thp: set THP defrag >> by default to madvise and add a stall-free defrag option") wrt the slub >> allocate_slab() part. AFAICS the intention in Mel's patch was that he >> removed a special case in __alloc_page_slowpath() where including >> __GFP_THISNODE and lacking ~__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM effectively means also >> lacking __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM. The commit log claims that slab/slub might >> change behavior so he moved the removal of __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM to them. >> >> But AFAICS, only slab uses __GFP_THISNODE, while slub doesn't. So your >> patch would indeed revert an unintentional change of Mel's commit. Is it >> right or do I miss something? > > I didn't look at that patch. What I tried here is just restoring first > intention of this code. I now realize that Mel did it for specific > purpose. Thanks for notifying it. > > Anyway, your analysis looks correct and this change doesn't hurt Mel's > intention and restores original behaviour of the code. I will add your > analysis on the commit description and resubmit it. Is it okay to you? Yeah, no problem. > Thanks. > -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>