On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Helge Deller <deller@xxxxxx> wrote: > On 26.08.2017 17:15, Dan Williams wrote: [..] >> I have not seen any patches for parisc pmem+dax enabling so it seems >> too early to worry about these "last mile" enabling features of >> MAP_DIRECT and MAP_SYNC. In particular parisc doesn't appear to have >> ARCH_ENABLE_MEMORY_HOTPLUG, so as far as I can see it can't yet >> support the ZONE_DEVICE scheme that is a pre-requisite for MAP_DIRECT. > > I see, but then it's probably best to not to define any MAP_DIRECT or > MAP_SYNC at all in the headers of those arches which don't support > pmem+dax (parisc, m68k, alpha, and probably quite some others). > That way applications can detect at configure time if the platform > supports that, and can leave out the functionality completely. Yes, that's a good idea we can handle this similar to CONFIG_MMAP_ALLOW_UNINITIALIZED. These patches will also modify 'struct file_operations' so that do_mmap() can validate whether a flag is supported on per architecture basis. Also the plan is to plumb the flags passed to the syscall all the way down to the individual mmap implementations. The ext4 and xfs ->mmap() operations will be able to return -EOPNOTSUP based on runtime variables. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
