On 08/24, Eric Biggers wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 03:20:41PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > On 08/23, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Commit 7c051267931a ("mm, fork: make dup_mmap wait for mmap_sem for
> > > write killable") made it possible to kill a forking task while it is
> > > waiting to acquire its ->mmap_sem for write, in dup_mmap(). However, it
> > > was overlooked that this introduced an new error path before a reference
> > > is taken on the mm_struct's ->exe_file.
> >
> > Hmm. Unless I am totally confused, the same problem with mm->exol_area?
> > I'll recheck....
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by ->exol_area.
I meant mm->uprobes_state.xol_area, sorry
> > > --- a/kernel/fork.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/fork.c
> > > @@ -806,6 +806,7 @@ static struct mm_struct *mm_init(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *p,
> > > mm_init_cpumask(mm);
> > > mm_init_aio(mm);
> > > mm_init_owner(mm, p);
> > > + RCU_INIT_POINTER(mm->exe_file, NULL);
> >
> > Can't we simply move
> >
> > RCU_INIT_POINTER(mm->exe_file, get_mm_exe_file(oldmm));
> >
> > from dup_mmap() here? Afaics this doesn't need mmap_sem.
> >
>
> Two problems, even assuming that get_mm_exe_file() doesn't require mmap_sem:
>
> - If mm_alloc_pgd() or init_new_context() in mm_init() fails, mm_init() doesn't
> do the full mmput(), so the file reference would not be dropped. So it would
> need to be changed to drop the file reference too.
Ah yes, I forgot that mm_init() can fail after that, thanks for correcting me.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
