Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] vfs: add flags parameter to ->mmap() in 'struct file_operations'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 04:48:40PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> We are running running short of vma->vm_flags. We can avoid needing a
> new VM_* flag in some cases if the original @flags submitted to mmap(2)
> is made available to the ->mmap() 'struct file_operations'
> implementation. For example, the proposed addition of MAP_DIRECT can be
> implemented without taking up a new vm_flags bit. Another motivation to
> avoid vm_flags is that they appear in /proc/$pid/smaps, and we have seen
> software that tries to dangerously (TOCTOU) read smaps to infer the
> behavior of a virtual address range.
> 
> This conversion was performed by the following semantic patch. There
> were a few manual edits for oddities like proc_reg_mmap.
> 
> Thanks to Julia for helping me with coccinelle iteration to cover cases
> where the mmap routine is defined in a separate file from the 'struct
> file_operations' instance that consumes it.

How are we going to check that an instance actually supports any
of those flags?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux