On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The *other* memory policies look fairly sane. They basically have a
> fairly well-defined preferred node for the policy (although the
> "MPOL_INTERLEAVE" looks wrong for a hugepage). But
> MPOL_PREFERRED/MPOL_F_LOCAL really looks completely broken.
Of course, I don't know if that customer test-case actually triggers
that MPOL_PREFERRED/MPOL_F_LOCAL case at all.
So again, that issue may not even be what is going on.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
