On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 02:09:58PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Ram Pai <linuxram@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
> > index d4e545d..fe1e7c7 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
> > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> > #include <linux/sched/debug.h>
> > #include <linux/kernel.h>
> > #include <linux/mm.h>
> > +#include <linux/pkeys.h>
> > #include <linux/stddef.h>
> > #include <linux/unistd.h>
> > #include <linux/ptrace.h>
> > @@ -247,6 +248,15 @@ void user_single_step_siginfo(struct task_struct *tsk,
> > info->si_addr = (void __user *)regs->nip;
> > }
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS
> > +static void fill_sig_info_pkey(int si_code, siginfo_t *info, unsigned long addr)
> > +{
> > + if (si_code != SEGV_PKUERR)
> > + return;
>
> Given that SEGV_PKUERR is a signal specific si_code this test is
> insufficient to detect an pkey error. You also need to check
> that signr == SIGSEGV
true. will make it a more precise check.
Thanks
RP
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
