* Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > BTW., I don't think the #ifdef is necessary: lockdep_init_map_crosslock should map > > to nothing when lockdep is disabled, right? > > IIUC, lockdep_init_map_crosslock is only defined when > CONFIG_LOCKDEP_CROSSRELEASE=y, Then lockdep_init_map_crosslock() should be defined in the !LOCKDEP case as well. > [...] moreover, completion::map, which used as > the parameter of lockdep_init_map_crosslock(), is only defined when > CONFIG_LOCKDEP_COMPLETE=y. If the !LOCKDEP wrapper is a CPP macro then it can ignore that parameter just fine, and it won't be built. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
