2017-08-16 12:51 GMT+08:00 Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 10:49:14AM +0800, Hui Zhu wrote:
>> Hi Minchan,
>>
>> 2017-08-16 10:13 GMT+08:00 Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>> > Hi Hui,
>> >
>> > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 05:56:30PM +0800, Hui Zhu wrote:
>> >> After commit e2846124f9a2 ("zsmalloc: zs_page_migrate: skip unnecessary
>> >
>> > This patch is not merged yet so the hash is invalid.
>> > That means we may fold this patch to [1] in current mmotm.
>> >
>> > [1] zsmalloc-zs_page_migrate-skip-unnecessary-loops-but-not-return-ebusy-if-zspage-is-not-inuse-fix.patch
>> >
>> >> loops but not return -EBUSY if zspage is not inuse") zs_page_migrate
>> >> can handle the ZS_EMPTY zspage.
>> >>
>> >> But I got some false in zs_page_isolate:
>> >> if (get_zspage_inuse(zspage) == 0) {
>> >> spin_unlock(&class->lock);
>> >> return false;
>> >> }
>> >
>> > I also realized we should make zs_page_isolate succeed on empty zspage
>> > because we allow the empty zspage migration from now on.
>> > Could you send a patch for that as well?
>>
>> OK. I will make a patch for that later.
>
> Please send the patch so I want to fold it to [1] before Andrew is going
> to send [1] to Linus.
>
> Thanks.
Done.
Thanks,
Hui
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
