On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 5:42 AM, Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon 14-08-17 23:12:22, Dan Williams wrote:
>> diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
>> index ff151814a02d..73fdc0ada9ee 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
>> @@ -306,6 +306,7 @@ struct vm_area_struct {
>> struct mm_struct *vm_mm; /* The address space we belong to. */
>> pgprot_t vm_page_prot; /* Access permissions of this VMA. */
>> unsigned long vm_flags; /* Flags, see mm.h. */
>> + unsigned long fs_flags; /* fs flags, see MAP_DIRECT etc */
>>
>> /*
>> * For areas with an address space and backing store,
>
> Ah, OK, here are VMA flags I was missing in the previous patch :) But why
> did you create separate fs_flags field for this? on 64-bit archs there's
> still space in vm_flags and frankly I don't see why we should separate
> MAP_DIRECT or MAP_SYNC from other flags?
Where would MAP_DIRECT go in the 32-bit case?
> After all a difference in these
> flags must also prevent VMA merging (which you forgot to handle I think)
> and they need to be copied on split (which happens by chance even now).
Ah, yes I did miss blocking the merge of a vma with MAP_DIRECT and one
without. However, the vma split path looks ok.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
