Re: [v5 2/4] mm, oom: cgroup-aware OOM killer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/15/2017 10:15 PM, Roman Gushchin wrote:
Generally, oom_score_adj should have a meaning only on a cgroup level,
so extending it to the system level doesn't sound as a good idea.

But wasn't the original purpose of oom_score (and oom_score_adj) to work on a system level, aka "normal" OOM? Is there some peculiarity about memcg OOM that I'm missing?

--
Aleksa Sarai
Software Engineer (Containers)
SUSE Linux GmbH
https://www.cyphar.com/

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux