Michal Hocko wrote: > On Tue 15-08-17 07:51:02, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > > Michal Hocko wrote: > [...] > > > Were you able to reproduce with other filesystems? > > > > Yes, I can reproduce this problem using both xfs and ext4 on 4.11.11-200.fc25.x86_64 > > on Oracle VM VirtualBox on Windows. > > Just a quick question. > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/201708112053.FIG52141.tHJSOQFLOFMFOV@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > mentioned next-20170811 kernel and this one 4.11. Your original report > as a reply to this thread > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/201708072228.FAJ09347.tOOVOFFQJSHMFL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > mentioned next-20170728. None of them seem to have this fix > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170807113839.16695-3-mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx so let > me ask again. Have you seen an unexpected content written with that > patch applied? No. All non-zero non-0xFF values are without that patch applied. I want to confirm that that patch actually fixes non-zero non-0xFF values (so that we can have better patch description for that patch). -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
