Re: [v6 04/15] mm: discard memblock data later

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon 14-08-17 09:39:17, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
> >>#ifdef CONFIG_MEMBLOCK in page_alloc, or define memblock_discard() stubs in
> >>nobootmem headfile.
> >
> >This is the standard way to do this. And it is usually preferred to
> >proliferate ifdefs in the code.
> 
> Hi Michal,
> 
> As you suggested, I sent-out this patch separately. If you feel strongly,
> that this should be updated to have stubs for platforms that do not
> implement memblock, please send a reply to that e-mail, so those who do not
> follow this tread will see it. Otherwise, I can leave it as is, page_alloc
> file already has a number memblock related ifdefs all of which can be
> cleaned out once every platform implements it (is it even achievable?)

I do not think this needs a repost just for this. This was merely a
JFYI, in case you would need to repost for other reasons then just
update that as well. But nothing really earth shattering.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux