On Fri 11-08-17 12:22:52, Pasha Tatashin wrote: > >>I will address your comment, and send out a new patch. Should I send it out > >>separately from the series or should I keep it inside? > > > >I would post it separatelly. It doesn't depend on the rest. > > OK, I will post it separately. No it does not depend on the rest, but the > reset depends on this. So, I am not sure how to enforce that this comes > before the rest. Andrew will take care of that. Just make it explicit that some of the patch depends on an earlier work when reposting. > >>Also, before I send out a new patch, I will need to root cause and resolve > >>problem found by kernel test robot <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>, and bisected > >>down to this patch. > >> > >>[ 156.659400] BUG: Bad page state in process swapper pfn:03147 > >>[ 156.660051] page:ffff88001ed8a1c0 count:0 mapcount:-127 mapping: > >>(null) index:0x1 > >>[ 156.660917] flags: 0x0() > >>[ 156.661198] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 > >>00000000ffffff80 > >>[ 156.662006] raw: ffff88001f4a8120 ffff88001ed85ce0 0000000000000000 > >>0000000000000000 > >>[ 156.662811] page dumped because: nonzero mapcount > >>[ 156.663307] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper Not tainted > >>4.13.0-rc3-00220-g1aad694 #1 > >>[ 156.664077] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS > >>1.9.3-20161025_171302-gandalf 04/01/2014 > >>[ 156.665129] Call Trace: > >>[ 156.665422] dump_stack+0x1e/0x20 > >>[ 156.665802] bad_page+0x122/0x148 > > > >Was the report related with this patch? > > Yes, they said that the problem was bisected down to this patch. Do you know > if there is a way to submit a patch to this test robot? You can ask them for re testing with an updated patch by replying to their report. ANyway I fail to see how the change could lead to this patch. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>