On 09/08/2017 15:18, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Laurent Dufour <ldufour@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Add new software events to count succeeded and failed speculative page >> faults. >> >> Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 2 ++ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h >> index b1c0b187acfe..fbfb03dff334 100644 >> --- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h >> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h >> @@ -111,6 +111,8 @@ enum perf_sw_ids { >> PERF_COUNT_SW_EMULATION_FAULTS = 8, >> PERF_COUNT_SW_DUMMY = 9, >> PERF_COUNT_SW_BPF_OUTPUT = 10, >> + PERF_COUNT_SW_SPF_DONE = 11, >> + PERF_COUNT_SW_SPF_FAILED = 12, > > Can't you calculate: > > PERF_COUNT_SW_SPF_FAILED = PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS - PERF_COUNT_SW_SPF_DONE > > ie. do you need a separate event for it? Unfortunately not, because PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS counts also page faults from the kernel space, while SPF is only concerning user space page faults. Cheers, Laurent. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>