On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Given the patches being busily submitted by trivial patch submitters to > make use kmem_cache_zalloc(), et. al, I believe we should remove the > unlikely() tests around the (gfp_flags & __GFP_ZERO) tests, such as: > > - if (unlikely((flags & __GFP_ZERO) && objp)) > + if ((flags & __GFP_ZERO) && objp) > memset(objp, 0, obj_size(cachep)); > > Agreed? If so, I'll send a patch... I support it. Recently Steven tried to gather the information. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1072767 Maybe he might have a number for that. > > - Ted > > -- > To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in > the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, > see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . > Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/ > Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a> > -- Kind regards, Minchan Kim -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/ Don't email: <a href