Re: [RFC] Tagging of vmalloc pages for supporting the pmalloc allocator

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri 04-08-17 11:02:46, Igor Stoppa wrote:
> 
> 
> On 03/08/17 18:15, Michal Hocko wrote:
> 
> > I would check the one where we have mapping. It is rather unlikely
> > vmalloc users would touch this one.
> 
> That was also the initial recommendation from Jerome Glisse, but it
> seemed unusable, because of the related comment.
> 
> I should have asked for clarifications back then :-(
> 
> But it's never too late ...
> 
> 
> struct page {
>   /* First double word block */
>   unsigned long flags;		/* Atomic flags, some possibly
> 				 * updated asynchronously */
> union {
> 	struct address_space *mapping;	/* If low bit clear, points to
> 					 * inode address_space, or NULL.
> 					 * If page mapped as anonymous
> 					 * memory, low bit is set, and
> 					 * it points to anon_vma object:
> 					 * see PAGE_MAPPING_ANON below.
> 					 */
> ...
> }
> 
> mapping seems to be used exclusively in 2 ways, based on the value of
> its lower bit.

Not really. The above applies to LRU pages. Please note that Slab pages
use s_mem and huge pages use compound_mapcount. If vmalloc pages are
using none of those already you can add a new field there.

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux