[CC Mel]
On Wed 02-08-17 17:45:56, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 6:50 AM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > while doing something completely unrelated to selinux I've noticed a
> > really strange __GFP_NOMEMALLOC usage pattern in selinux, especially
> > GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC doesn't make much sense to me. GFP_ATOMIC
> > on its own allows to access memory reserves while the later flag tells
> > we cannot use memory reserves at all. The primary usecase for
> > __GFP_NOMEMALLOC is to override a global PF_MEMALLOC should there be a
> > need.
> >
> > It all leads to fa1aa143ac4a ("selinux: extended permissions for
> > ioctls") which doesn't explain this aspect so let me ask. Why is the
> > flag used at all? Moreover shouldn't GFP_ATOMIC be actually GFP_NOWAIT.
> > What makes this path important to access memory reserves?
>
> [NOTE: added the SELinux list to the CC line, please include that list
> when asking SELinux questions]
Sorry about that. Will keep it in mind for next posts
> The GFP_ATOMIC|__GFP_NOMEMALLOC use in SELinux appears to be limited
> to security/selinux/avc.c, and digging a bit, I'm guessing commit
> fa1aa143ac4a copied the combination from 6290c2c43973 ("selinux: tag
> avc cache alloc as non-critical") and the avc_alloc_node() function.
Thanks for the pointer. That makes much more sense now. Back in 2012 we
really didn't have a good way to distinguish non sleeping and atomic
with reserves allocations.
> I can't say that I'm an expert at the vm subsystem and the variety of
> different GFP_* flags, but your suggestion of moving to GFP_NOWAIT in
> security/selinux/avc.c seems reasonable and in keeping with the idea
> behind commit 6290c2c43973.
What do you think about the following? I haven't tested it but it should
be rather straightforward.
---
>From 6d506a75da83c0724ed399966971711f37d67411 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 10:04:20 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] selinux: replace GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC with
GFP_NOWAIT
selinux avc code uses a weird combination of gfp flags. It asks for
GFP_ATOMIC which allows access to memory reserves while it requests
to not consume memory reserves by __GFP_NOMEMALLOC. This seems to be
copying the pattern from 6290c2c43973 ("selinux: tag avc cache alloc as
non-critical").
Back then (before d0164adc89f6 ("mm, page_alloc: distinguish between
being unable to sleep, unwilling to sleep and avoiding waking kswapd"))
we didn't have a good way to distinguish nowait and atomic allocations
so the construct made some sense. Now we do not have to play tricks
though and GFP_NOWAIT will provide the required semantic (aka do not
sleep and do not consume any memory reserves).
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
---
security/selinux/avc.c | 14 ++++++--------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/selinux/avc.c b/security/selinux/avc.c
index 4b4293194aee..b2c159e832b6 100644
--- a/security/selinux/avc.c
+++ b/security/selinux/avc.c
@@ -346,27 +346,26 @@ static struct avc_xperms_decision_node
struct avc_xperms_decision_node *xpd_node;
struct extended_perms_decision *xpd;
- xpd_node = kmem_cache_zalloc(avc_xperms_decision_cachep,
- GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC);
+ xpd_node = kmem_cache_zalloc(avc_xperms_decision_cachep, GFP_NOWAIT);
if (!xpd_node)
return NULL;
xpd = &xpd_node->xpd;
if (which & XPERMS_ALLOWED) {
xpd->allowed = kmem_cache_zalloc(avc_xperms_data_cachep,
- GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC);
+ GFP_NOWAIT);
if (!xpd->allowed)
goto error;
}
if (which & XPERMS_AUDITALLOW) {
xpd->auditallow = kmem_cache_zalloc(avc_xperms_data_cachep,
- GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC);
+ GFP_NOWAIT);
if (!xpd->auditallow)
goto error;
}
if (which & XPERMS_DONTAUDIT) {
xpd->dontaudit = kmem_cache_zalloc(avc_xperms_data_cachep,
- GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC);
+ GFP_NOWAIT);
if (!xpd->dontaudit)
goto error;
}
@@ -394,8 +393,7 @@ static struct avc_xperms_node *avc_xperms_alloc(void)
{
struct avc_xperms_node *xp_node;
- xp_node = kmem_cache_zalloc(avc_xperms_cachep,
- GFP_ATOMIC|__GFP_NOMEMALLOC);
+ xp_node = kmem_cache_zalloc(avc_xperms_cachep, GFP_NOWAIT);
if (!xp_node)
return xp_node;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&xp_node->xpd_head);
@@ -548,7 +546,7 @@ static struct avc_node *avc_alloc_node(void)
{
struct avc_node *node;
- node = kmem_cache_zalloc(avc_node_cachep, GFP_ATOMIC|__GFP_NOMEMALLOC);
+ node = kmem_cache_zalloc(avc_node_cachep, GFP_NOWAIT);
if (!node)
goto out;
--
2.13.2
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
