On Mon 31-07-17 14:40:53, Gerald Schaefer wrote: [...] > > @@ -247,12 +248,12 @@ int __meminit vmemmap_populate(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, int node) > > * use large frames even if they are only partially > > * used. > > * Otherwise we would have also page tables since > > - * vmemmap_populate gets called for each section > > + * __vmemmap_populate gets called for each section > > * separately. */ > > if (MACHINE_HAS_EDAT1) { > > void *new_page; > > > > - new_page = vmemmap_alloc_block(PMD_SIZE, node); > > + new_page = __vmemmap_alloc_block_buf(PMD_SIZE, node, altmap); > > if (!new_page) > > goto out; > > pmd_val(*pm_dir) = __pa(new_page) | sgt_prot; > > There is another call to vmemmap_alloc_block() in this function, a couple > of lines below, this should also be replaced by __vmemmap_alloc_block_buf(). I've noticed that one but in general I have only transformed PMD mappings because we shouldn't even get to pte level if the forme works AFAICS. Memory sections should be always 2MB aligned unless I am missing something. Or is this not true? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>