Re: [PATCH 0/3] memdelay: memory health metric for systems and workloads

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2017-07-29 at 04:48 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-07-27 at 11:30 -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > 
> > Structure
> > 
> > The first patch cleans up the different loadavg callsites and macros
> > as the memdelay averages are going to be tracked using these.
> > 
> > The second patch adds a distinction between page cache transitions
> > (inactive list refaults) and page cache thrashing (active list
> > refaults), since only the latter are unproductive refaults.
> > 
> > The third patch finally adds the memdelay accounting and interface:
> > its scheduler side identifies productive and unproductive task states,
> > and the VM side aggregates them into system and cgroup domain states
> > and calculates moving averages of the time spent in each state.
> 
> What tree is this against?  ttwu asm delta says "measure me".

(mm/master.. gee)

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux