On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 02:04:28PM +0100, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> Commit fa06235b8eb0 ("cgroup: reset css on destruction") caused
> css_reset callback to be called from the offlining path. Although
> it solves the problem mentioned in the commit description
> ("For instance, memory cgroup needs to reset memory.low, otherwise
> pages charged to a dead cgroup might never get reclaimed."),
> generally speaking, it's not correct.
>
> An offline cgroup can still be a resource domain, and we shouldn't
> grant it more resources than it had before deletion.
>
> For instance, if an offline memory cgroup has dirty pages, we should
> still imply i/o limits during writeback.
>
> The css_reset callback is designed to return the cgroup state
> into the original state, that means reset all limits and counters.
> It's spomething different from the offlining, and we shouldn't use
> it from the offlining path. Instead, we should adjust necessary
> settings from the per-controller css_offline callbacks (e.g. reset
> memory.low).
>
> Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: kernel-team@xxxxxx
> Cc: cgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
