On Thu 27-07-17 11:30:50, Wenwei Tao wrote:
> 2017-07-26 21:44 GMT+08:00 Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> > On Wed 26-07-17 21:07:42, Wenwei Tao wrote:
[...]
> >> I think there is a css double put in mem_cgroup_iter. Under reclaim,
> >> we call mem_cgroup_iter the first time with prev == NULL, and we get
> >> last_visited memcg from per zone's reclaim_iter then call __mem_cgroup_iter_next
> >> try to get next alive memcg, __mem_cgroup_iter_next could return NULL
> >> if last_visited is already the last one so we put the last_visited's
> >> memcg css and continue to the next while loop, this time we might not
> >> do css_tryget(&last_visited->css) if the dead_count is changed, but
> >> we still do css_put(&last_visited->css), we put it twice, this could
> >> trigger the BUG_ON at kernel/cgroup.c:893.
> >
> > Yes, I guess your are right and I suspect that this has been silently
> > fixed by 519ebea3bf6d ("mm: memcontrol: factor out reclaim iterator
> > loading and updating"). I think a more appropriate fix is would be.
> > Are you able to reproduce and re-test it?
> > ---
>
> Yes, I think this commit can fix this issue, and I backport this
> commit to 3.10.107 kernel and cannot reproduce this issue. I guess
> this commit might need to be backported to 3.10.y stable kernel.
Please send it to the kernel-stable mailing list. 3.10 seems to be still
maintained.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
