On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 01:55:36PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> +int file_write_and_wait(struct file *file)
> +{
> + int err = 0, err2;
> + struct address_space *mapping = file->f_mapping;
> +
> + if ((!dax_mapping(mapping) && mapping->nrpages) ||
> + (dax_mapping(mapping) && mapping->nrexceptional)) {
Since patch 1 exists, shouldn't this use the new helper?
> + err = filemap_fdatawrite(mapping);
> + /* See comment of filemap_write_and_wait() */
> + if (err != -EIO) {
> + loff_t i_size = i_size_read(mapping->host);
> +
> + if (i_size != 0)
> + __filemap_fdatawait_range(mapping, 0,
> + i_size - 1);
> + }
> + }
> + err2 = file_check_and_advance_wb_err(file);
> + if (!err)
> + err = err2;
> + return err;
Would this be clearer written as:
if (err)
return err;
return err2;
or even ...
return err ? err : err2;
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
