On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 12:47:42AM -0400, Prakash Sangappa wrote: > Signed-off-by: Prakash Sangappa <prakash.sangappa@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c | 121 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Like Mike said, some comment about the test would be better, commit messages are never one liners in the kernel. > @@ -408,6 +409,7 @@ static int copy_page(int ufd, unsigned long offset) > userfaults++; > break; > case UFFD_EVENT_FORK: > + close(uffd); > uffd = msg.arg.fork.ufd; > pollfd[0].fd = uffd; > break; Isn't this fd leak bugfix independent of the rest of the changes? The only side effects should have been that it could run out of fds, but I assume this was found by source review as I doubt it could run out of fds. This could be splitted off in a separate patch. Overall it looks a good test also exercising UFFD_EVENT_FORK at the same time. Thanks, Andrea -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
