Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Has anyone addressed my issue with it that this is wide-open for > abuse by allocating large chunks of memory, and then remapping > them in some way with different attributes, thereby violating the > ARM architecture specification? > > In other words, do we _actually_ have a use for this which doesn't > involve doing something like allocating 32MB of memory from it, > remapping it so that it's DMA coherent, and then performing DMA > on the resulting buffer? Huge pages. Also, don't treat it as coherent memory and just flush/clear/invalidate cache before and after each DMA transaction. I never understood what's wrong with that approach. -- Best regards, _ _ .o. | Liege of Serenly Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o ..o | Computer Science, Michal "mina86" Nazarewicz (o o) ooo +--<mina86-tlen.pl>--<jid:mina86-jabber.org>--ooO--(_)--Ooo-- -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>