On 07/11/2017 05:36 AM, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Thu 06-07-17 09:17:26, Mike Kravetz wrote: >> The mremap system call has the ability to 'mirror' parts of an existing >> mapping. To do so, it creates a new mapping that maps the same pages as >> the original mapping, just at a different virtual address. This >> functionality has existed since at least the 2.6 kernel. >> >> This patch simply adds a new flag to mremap which will make this >> functionality part of the API. It maintains backward compatibility with >> the existing way of requesting mirroring (old_size == 0). >> >> If this new MREMAP_MIRROR flag is specified, then new_size must equal >> old_size. In addition, the MREMAP_MAYMOVE flag must be specified. > > I have to admit that this came as a suprise to me. There is no mention > about this special case in the man page and the mremap code is so > convoluted that I simply didn't see it there. I guess the only > reasonable usecase is when you do not have a fd for the shared memory. I was surprised as well when a JVM developer pointed this out. >From the old e-mail thread, here is original use case: shmget(IPC_PRIVATE, 31498240, 0x1c0|0600) = 11337732 shmat(11337732, 0, 0) = 0x40299000 shmctl(11337732, IPC_RMID, 0) = 0 mremap(0x402a9000, 0, 65536, MREMAP_MAYMOVE|MREMAP_FIXED, 0) = 0 mremap(0x402a9000, 0, 65536, MREMAP_MAYMOVE|MREMAP_FIXED, 0x100000) = 0x100000 The JVM team wants to do something similar. They are using mmap(MAP_ANONYMOUS|MAP_SHARED) to create the initial mapping instead of shmget/shmat. As Vlastimil mentioned previously, one would not expect a shared mapping for parts of the JVM heap. I am working to get clarification from the JVM team. > Anyway the patch should fail with -EINVAL on private mappings as Kirill > already pointed out Yes. I think this should be a separate patch. As mentioned earlier, mremap today creates a new/additional private mapping if called in this way with old_size == 0. To me, this is a bug. > and this should go along with an update to the > man page which describes also the historical behavior. Yes, man page updates are a must. One reason for the RFC was to determine if people thought we should: 1) Just document the existing old_size == 0 functionality 2) Create a more explicit interface such as a new mremap flag for this functionality I am waiting to see what direction people prefer before making any man page updates. > Make sure you > document that this is not really a mirroring (e.g. faulting page in one > address will automatically map it to the other mapping(s)) but merely a > copy of the range. Maybe MREMAP_COPY would be more appropriate name. Good point. mirror is the first word that came to mind, but it does not exactly apply. -- Mike Kravetz > >> Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> include/uapi/linux/mman.h | 5 +++-- >> mm/mremap.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++------- >> tools/include/uapi/linux/mman.h | 5 +++-- >> 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/mman.h b/include/uapi/linux/mman.h >> index ade4acd..6b3e0df 100644 >> --- a/include/uapi/linux/mman.h >> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/mman.h >> @@ -3,8 +3,9 @@ >> >> #include <asm/mman.h> >> >> -#define MREMAP_MAYMOVE 1 >> -#define MREMAP_FIXED 2 >> +#define MREMAP_MAYMOVE 0x01 >> +#define MREMAP_FIXED 0x02 >> +#define MREMAP_MIRROR 0x04 >> >> #define OVERCOMMIT_GUESS 0 >> #define OVERCOMMIT_ALWAYS 1 >> diff --git a/mm/mremap.c b/mm/mremap.c >> index cd8a1b1..f18ab36 100644 >> --- a/mm/mremap.c >> +++ b/mm/mremap.c >> @@ -516,10 +516,11 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(mremap, unsigned long, addr, unsigned long, old_len, >> struct vm_userfaultfd_ctx uf = NULL_VM_UFFD_CTX; >> LIST_HEAD(uf_unmap); >> >> - if (flags & ~(MREMAP_FIXED | MREMAP_MAYMOVE)) >> + if (flags & ~(MREMAP_FIXED | MREMAP_MAYMOVE | MREMAP_MIRROR)) >> return ret; >> >> - if (flags & MREMAP_FIXED && !(flags & MREMAP_MAYMOVE)) >> + if ((flags & MREMAP_FIXED || flags & MREMAP_MIRROR) && >> + !(flags & MREMAP_MAYMOVE)) >> return ret; >> >> if (offset_in_page(addr)) >> @@ -528,14 +529,22 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(mremap, unsigned long, addr, unsigned long, old_len, >> old_len = PAGE_ALIGN(old_len); >> new_len = PAGE_ALIGN(new_len); >> >> - /* >> - * We allow a zero old-len as a special case >> - * for DOS-emu "duplicate shm area" thing. But >> - * a zero new-len is nonsensical. >> - */ >> + /* A zero new-len is nonsensical. */ >> if (!new_len) >> return ret; >> >> + /* >> + * For backward compatibility, we allow a zero old-len to imply >> + * mirroring. This was originally a special case for DOS-emu. >> + */ >> + if (!old_len) >> + flags |= MREMAP_MIRROR; >> + else if (flags & MREMAP_MIRROR) { >> + if (old_len != new_len) >> + return ret; >> + old_len = 0; >> + } >> + >> if (down_write_killable(¤t->mm->mmap_sem)) >> return -EINTR; >> >> diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/mman.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/mman.h >> index 81d8edf..069f7a5 100644 >> --- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/mman.h >> +++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/mman.h >> @@ -3,8 +3,9 @@ >> >> #include <uapi/asm/mman.h> >> >> -#define MREMAP_MAYMOVE 1 >> -#define MREMAP_FIXED 2 >> +#define MREMAP_MAYMOVE 0x01 >> +#define MREMAP_FIXED 0x02 >> +#define MREMAP_MIRROR 0x04 >> >> #define OVERCOMMIT_GUESS 0 >> #define OVERCOMMIT_ALWAYS 1 >> -- >> 2.7.5 >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in >> the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, >> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . >> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a> > -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>