On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 05:29:26PM +0200, Laurent Dufour wrote: > Based on the benchmarks I run, it doesn't fail so much often, but I was > thinking about adding some counters here. The system is accounting for > major page faults and minor ones, respectively current->maj_flt and > current->min_flt. I was wondering if an additional type like async_flt will > be welcome or if there is another smarter way to get that metric. > > Feel free to advise. You could stick a tracepoint in, or extend PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS*. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
