On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 02:04:31PM +0100, Roman Gushchin wrote: > High-order allocations are obviously more costly, and it's very useful > to know how many of them happens, if there are any issues > (or suspicions) with memory fragmentation. > > This commit changes existing per-zone allocation counters to be > per-zone per-order. These counters are displayed using a new > procfs interface (similar to /proc/buddyinfo): > > $ cat /proc/allocinfo > DMA 0 0 0 0 0 \ > 0 0 0 0 0 0 > DMA32 3 0 1 0 0 \ > 0 0 0 0 0 0 > Normal 4997056 23594 10902 23686 931 \ > 23 122 786 17 1 0 > Movable 0 0 0 0 0 \ > 0 0 0 0 0 0 > Device 0 0 0 0 0 \ > 0 0 0 0 0 0 > > The existing vmstat interface remains untouched*, and still shows > the total number of single page allocations, so high-order allocations > are represented as a corresponding number of order-0 allocations. > > $ cat /proc/vmstat | grep alloc > pgalloc_dma 0 > pgalloc_dma32 7 > pgalloc_normal 5461660 > pgalloc_movable 0 > pgalloc_device 0 > > * I've added device zone for consistency with other zones, > and to avoid messy exclusion of this zone in the code. > The alloc counter updates are themselves a surprisingly heavy cost to the allocation path and this makes it worse for a debugging case that is relatively rare. I'm extremely reluctant for such a patch to be added given that the tracepoints can be used to assemble such a monitor even if it means running a userspace daemon to keep track of it. Would such a solution be suitable? Failing that if this is a severe issue, would it be possible to at least make this a compile-time or static tracepoint option? That way, only people that really need it have to take the penalty. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
