Michal Hocko wrote: > On Sat 01-07-17 20:43:56, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > > Michal Hocko wrote: > [...] > > > It is really hard to pursue this half solution when there is no clear > > > indication it helps in your testing. So could you try to test with only > > > this patch on top of the current linux-next tree (or Linus tree) and see > > > if you can reproduce the problem? > > > > With this patch on top of next-20170630, I no longer hit this problem. > > (Of course, this is because this patch eliminates the infinite loop.) > > I assume you haven't seen other negative side effects, like unexpected > OOMs etc... Are you willing to give your Tested-by? I didn't see other negative side effects. Tested-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> We need long time for testing this patch at linux-next.git (and I give up this handy bug for finding other bugs under almost OOM situation). -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
