Re: [PATCH] mm: add replace_page_cache_page() function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 17 Dec 2010, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> No. memory cgroup expects all pages should be found on LRU. But, IIUC,
> pages on this radix-tree will not be on LRU. So, memory cgroup can't find
> it at destroying cgroup and can't reduce "usage" of resource to be 0.
> This makes rmdir() returns -EBUSY.

Oh, right.  Yes, the page will be on the LRU (it needs to be,
otherwise the VM coulnd't reclaim it).  After the
add_to_page_cache_locked is this:

	if (!(buf->flags & PIPE_BUF_FLAG_LRU))
		lru_cache_add_file(newpage);

It will add the page to the LRU, unless it's already on it.

Thanks,
Miklos

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]