On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 12:15:05PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > That would lead to conflicts when backporting to stable trees though > > which is quite annoying as well and arguably slightly more annoying than > > resolving this in mmotm. I can help to rebase Oleg's patch on top of > > mine which is not a stable material. > > Ok, fair enough - I was actually expecting that Oleg's patch would > just be marked for stable too just to keep differences minimal. > > But yes, putting your patch in first and then Oleg's on top means that > it works regardless. > > Any opinions from others? No pb here, and this one is reasonably easy to backport anyway as the test is easy to locate. Willy -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
