On Thu, 2017-06-29 at 07:12 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Nice and simple, this looks great! > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> Thanks! I think this turned out to be a lot cleaner too. For filesystems that use filemap_write_and_wait_range today this now becomes a pretty straight conversion to file_write_and_wait_range -- one liner patches for the most part. I've started rolling patches to do that, but now I'm wondering... Should I aim to do that with an individual patch for each fs, or is it better to do a swath of them all at once in a single patch here? -- Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
