Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] base/memory: pass start_section_nr to init_memory_block()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 12:11:52AM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
>On 06/24/2017 07:52 PM, Wei Yang wrote:
>> The second parameter of init_memory_block() is to calculate the
>> start_section_nr for the memory_block. While current implementation dose
>> some unnecessary transform between mem_sectioni and section_nr.
>
>Hi Wei,
>
>I am unable to find anything wrong with this patch (except of course
>that your top-level description in the "[PATCH 0/4" thread will need
>to be added somewhere).
>
>Here's a slight typo/grammar improvement for the patch
>description above, if you like:
>
>"The current implementation does some unnecessary conversions
>between mem_section and section_nr."
>

Thanks :-)

>thanks,
>john h
>

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux