[PATCH] mm, swap: don't disable preemption while taking the per-CPU cache

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



get_cpu_var() disables preemption and returns the per-CPU version of the
variable. Disabling preemption is useful to ensure atomic access to the
variable within the critical section.
In this case however, after the per-CPU version of the variable is
obtained the ->free_lock is acquired. For that reason it seems the raw
accessor could be used. It only seems that ->slots_ret should be
retested (because with disabled preemption this variable can not be set
to NULL otherwise).
This popped up during PREEMPT-RT testing because it tries to take
spinlocks in a preempt disabled section.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
On 2017-06-23 12:34:23 [+0200], Michal Hocko wrote:
> The changelog doesn't explain, why does this change matter. Disabling
> preemption shortly before taking a spinlock shouldn't make much
> difference. I suspect you care because of RT, right? In that case spell
> that in the changelog and explain why it matters.

yes, it is bad for RT. I added the RT pieces as explanation.

> Other than hat the patch looks good to me.

Thank you. +akpm.

 mm/swap_slots.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/swap_slots.c b/mm/swap_slots.c
index 58f6c78f1dad..51c304477482 100644
--- a/mm/swap_slots.c
+++ b/mm/swap_slots.c
@@ -272,11 +272,11 @@ int free_swap_slot(swp_entry_t entry)
 {
 	struct swap_slots_cache *cache;
 
-	cache = &get_cpu_var(swp_slots);
+	cache = raw_cpu_ptr(&swp_slots);
 	if (use_swap_slot_cache && cache->slots_ret) {
 		spin_lock_irq(&cache->free_lock);
 		/* Swap slots cache may be deactivated before acquiring lock */
-		if (!use_swap_slot_cache) {
+		if (!use_swap_slot_cache || !cache->slots_ret) {
 			spin_unlock_irq(&cache->free_lock);
 			goto direct_free;
 		}
@@ -296,7 +296,6 @@ int free_swap_slot(swp_entry_t entry)
 direct_free:
 		swapcache_free_entries(&entry, 1);
 	}
-	put_cpu_var(swp_slots);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.13.1

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux