* Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 11:14 PM, Andrew Morton > <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 16:14:16 +0200 Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> Add arch_ prefix to all atomic operations and include > >> <asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h>. This will allow > >> to add KASAN instrumentation to all atomic ops. > > > > This gets a large number of (simple) rejects when applied to > > linux-next. Can you please redo against -next? > > > This is based on tip/locking tree. Ingo already took a part of these > series. The plan is that he takes the rest, and this applies on > tip/locking without conflicts. Yeah, so I've taken the rest as well, it all looks very clean now. Should show up in the next -next, if it passes my (arguably limited) testing. Andrew, is this workflow fine with you? You usually take KASAN patches, but I was unhappy with the atomics instrumention of the earlier patches, and ended up reviewing the followup variants, and felt that if I hinder a patchset I might as well test and apply it once I'm happy with them! ;-) Should be a special exception for this series only. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
