On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> There are three performance benefits here: > > Side note: can you post the actual performance numbers, even if only > from some silly test program on just one platform? Things like lmbench > pipe benchmark or something? > > Or maybe you did, and I just missed it. But when talking about > performance, I'd really like to always see some actual numbers. Here are some timings using KVM: pingpong between two processes using eventfd: patched: 883ns unpatched: 1046ns (with considerably higher variance) madvise(MADV_DONTNEED); write to the page; switch CPUs: patched: ~12.5us unpatched: 19us The latter test is a somewhat contrived example to show off the improved laziness. Current kernels send an IPI on each iteration if the system is otherwise idle. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
