On 09/06/17 21:56, Laura Abbott wrote:
> On 06/07/2017 05:35 AM, Igor Stoppa wrote:
[...]
> The pool logic looks remarkably similar to genalloc (lib/genalloc.c).
> It's not a perfect 1-to-1 mapping but it's close enough to be worth
> a look.
Indeed. I have prepared a new incarnation of pmalloc, based on genalloc.
There are a couple of things that I would like to adjust in genalloc,
but I'll discuss this in the new submission.
>> +
>> +const char msg[] = "Not a valid Pmalloc object.";
>> +const char *__pmalloc_check_object(const void *ptr, unsigned long n)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long p;
>> +
>> + p = (unsigned long)ptr;
>> + n = p + n - 1;
>> + for (; (PAGE_MASK & p) <= (PAGE_MASK & n); p += PAGE_SIZE) {
>> + if (is_vmalloc_addr((void *)p)) {
>> + struct page *page;
>> +
>> + page = vmalloc_to_page((void *)p);
>> + if (!(page && PagePmalloc(page)))
>> + return msg;
>> + }
>
> Should this be an error if is_vmalloc_addr returns false?
Yes, if this function is called, at least the beginning of the range
*is* a vmalloc address and therefore the rest should be a vmalloc
address as well.
thanks, igor
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
