Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] x86/mm: Rework lazy TLB mode and TLB freshness tracking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/13/2017 09:56 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> -	if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &batch->cpumask))
> +	if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &batch->cpumask)) {
> +		local_irq_disable();
>  		flush_tlb_func_local(&info, TLB_LOCAL_SHOOTDOWN);
> +		local_irq_enable();
> +	}
> +

Could you talk a little about why this needs to be local_irq_disable()
and not preempt_disable()?  Is it about the case where somebody is
trying to call flush_tlb_func_*() from an interrupt handler?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux