Hello, Waiman. On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 02:44:48PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: > > And cgroup-v2 has this 'exception' (aka wart) for the root group which > > needs to be replicated for each namespace. > > One of the changes that I proposed in my patches was to get rid of the > no internal process constraint. I think that will solve a big part of > the container invariant problem that we have with cgroup v2. I'm not sure. It just masks it without actually solving it. I mean, the constraint is thereq for a reason. "Solving" it would defeat one of the main capabilities for resource domains and masking it from kernel side doesn't make whole lot of sense to me given that it's something which can be easily done from userland. If we take out that part, for controllers which don't care about resource domains, wouldn't thread mode be a sufficient solution? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
