On Thu 01-06-17 11:26:08, David Howells wrote: > Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > The callback doesn't ever get called. Remove it. > > Hmmm... I should perhaps be calling this. I'm not sure why I never did. > > At the moment, it doesn't strictly matter as ops on pages marked with > PG_fscache get ignored if the cache has suffered an I/O error or has been > withdrawn - but it will incur a performance penalty (the PG_fscache flag is > checked in the netfs before calling into fscache). > > The downside of calling this is that when a cache is removed, fscache would go > through all the cookies for that cache and iterate over all the pages > associated with those cookies - which could cause a performance dip in the > system. So I know nothing about fscache. If you decide these functions should stay in as you are going to use them soon, then I can just convert them to the new API as everything else. What just caught my eye and why I had a more detailed look is that I didn't understand that 'PAGEVEC_SIZE - pagevec_count(&pvec)' as a pagevec_lookup() argument since pagevec_count() should always return 0 at that point? Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
