Yury Norov <ynorov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 01:39:00PM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote: >> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:12:56AM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote: >> > On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 02:17:20PM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote: >> > > To re-implement slab cache vs. page cache balancing, we'll need the >> > > slab counters at the lruvec level, which, ever since lru reclaim was >> > > moved from the zone to the node, is the intersection of the node, not >> > > the zone, and the memcg. >> > > >> > > We could retain the per-zone counters for when the page allocator >> > > dumps its memory information on failures, and have counters on both >> > > levels - which on all but NUMA node 0 is usually redundant. But let's >> > > keep it simple for now and just move them. If anybody complains we can >> > > restore the per-zone counters. >> > > >> > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> > This patch causes an early boot crash on s390 (linux-next as of today). >> > CONFIG_NUMA on/off doesn't make any difference. I haven't looked any >> > further into this yet, maybe you have an idea? > > The same on arm64. And powerpc. cheers -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
