On 05/29/2017 01:41 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
>
> 20b2f52b73fe ("numa: add CONFIG_MOVABLE_NODE for movable-dedicated
> node") has introduced CONFIG_MOVABLE_NODE without a good explanation on
> why it is actually useful. It makes a lot of sense to make movable node
> semantic opt in but we already have that because the feature has to be
> explicitly enabled on the kernel command line. A config option on top
> only makes the configuration space larger without a good reason. It also
> adds an additional ifdefery that pollutes the code. Just drop the config
> option and make it de-facto always enabled. This shouldn't introduce any
> change to the semantic.
>
> Acked-by: Reza Arbab <arbab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
