Re: [PATCHv1, RFC 5/8] x86/mm: Fold p4d page table layer at runtime

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 6:46 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov
<kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 11:09:54AM -0400, Brian Gerst wrote:
>> >  static inline int pgd_none(pgd_t pgd)
>> >  {
>> > +       if (p4d_folded)
>> > +               return 0;
>> >         /*
>> >          * There is no need to do a workaround for the KNL stray
>> >          * A/D bit erratum here.  PGDs only point to page tables
>>
>> These should use static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_LA57), so that it gets
>> patched by alternatives.
>
> Right, eventually we would likely need something like this. But at this
> point I'm more worried about correctness than performance. Performance
> will be the next step.
>
> And I haven't tried it yet, but I would expect direct use of alternatives
> wouldn't be possible. If I read code correctly, we enable paging way
> before we apply alternatives. But we need to have something functional in
> between.

static_cpu_has() does the check dynamically before alternatives are
applied, so using it early isn't a problem.

--
Brian Gerst

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux