Re: [PATCHv1, RFC 0/8] Boot-time switching between 4- and 5-level paging

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On May 26, 2017 8:51:48 AM PDT, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 6:00 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov
><kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> I don't see how kernel threads can use 4-level paging. It doesn't
>work
>> from virtual memory layout POV. Kernel claims half of full virtual
>address
>> space for itself -- 256 PGD entries, not one as we would effectively
>have
>> in case of switching to 4-level paging. For instance, addresses,
>where
>> vmalloc and vmemmap are mapped, are not canonical with 4-level
>paging.
>
>I would have just assumed we'd map the kernel in the shared part that
>fits in the top 47 bits.
>
>But it sounds like you can't switch back and forth anyway, so I guess
>it's moot.
>
>Where *is* the LA57 documentation, btw? I had an old x86 architecture
>manual, so I updated it, but LA57 isn't mentioned in the new one
>either.
>
>                       Linus

As one of the major motivations for LA57 is that we expect that we will have machines with more than 2^46 bytes of memory in the near future, it isn't feasible in most cases to do per-VM LA57.

The only case where that even has any utility is for an application to want more than 128 TiB address space on a machine with no more than 64 TiB of RAM.  It is kind of a narrow use case, I think.
-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux