On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 05:23:30PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 05:21:08PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 05:09:17PM +0100, Luis Henriques wrote: > > > On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 04:42:16PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > > > The scan_block() function updates the number of references (pointers) to > > > > objects, adding them to the gray_list when object->min_count is reached. > > > > The patch factors out this functionality into a separate update_refs() > > > > function. > > > > > > > > Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> > [...] > > > FWIW, I've tested this patchset and I don't see kmemleak triggering the > > > false positives anymore. > > > > Thanks for re-testing (I dropped your tested-by from the initial patch > > since I made a small modification). > > Sorry, the "re-testing" comment was meant at the other Luis on cc ;) > (Luis R. Rodriguez). It's been a long day... Heh, no worries! What are the odds of having 2 different guys named Luis testing the same patch? :-) Cheers, -- Luís -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
