On 05/26/2017 at 10:49 AM, Dave Young wrote: > Ccing Xunlei he is reading the patches see what need to be done for > kdump. There should still be several places to handle to make kdump work. > > On 05/18/17 at 07:01pm, Borislav Petkov wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 04:22:12PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote: >>> Add sysfs support for SME so that user-space utilities (kdump, etc.) can >>> determine if SME is active. >> But why do user-space tools need to know that? >> >> I mean, when we load the kdump kernel, we do it with the first kernel, >> with the kexec_load() syscall, AFAICT. And that code does a lot of >> things during that init, like machine_kexec_prepare()->init_pgtable() to >> prepare the ident mapping of the second kernel, for example. >> >> What I'm aiming at is that the first kernel knows *exactly* whether SME >> is enabled or not and doesn't need to tell the second one through some >> sysfs entries - it can do that during loading. >> >> So I don't think we need any userspace things at all... > If kdump kernel can get the SME status from hardware register then this > should be not necessary and this patch can be dropped. Yes, I also agree with dropping this one. Regards, Xunlei -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
